Israel’s latest diplomatic overtures to Syria and Lebanon highlight a complex Middle East peace puzzle, with some key pieces seemingly missing. Foreign Minister Gideon Saar expressed interest in normalization on Monday, viewing Iran’s perceived weakening as an opportunity, but his insistence on the non-negotiable Golan Heights and rejection of Palestinian statehood create significant gaps.
This strategic move follows a tumultuous period, marked by nearly two years of war in Gaza and Israeli military operations in Lebanon targeting Hezbollah. Israeli leaders believe these regional changes create a window for forging new diplomatic relationships and broadening the “circle of peace.”
However, Saar’s declaration regarding the Golan Heights, annexed by Israel in 1981 after its 1967 capture from Syria, immediately creates a fundamental disagreement. The international community largely views the Golan as occupied Syrian land, a position reinforced by Syria’s unwavering demand for its return, despite President Donald Trump’s recognition of Israeli sovereignty.
A major impediment, however, is the 2002 Arab Peace Initiative. A senior Syrian official reiterated that any normalization must be rooted in this initiative, which calls for Israeli withdrawal from all occupied territories and the establishment of an independent Palestinian state. Israel’s Foreign Minister, Saar, dismissed the Palestinian statehood precondition as “not constructive” and a security threat, highlighting a fundamental disagreement that complicates this intricate Middle East peace puzzle.